Relative importance of Corsi and the other 42%

Today apparently there was some discussion about the Avalanche and their non-interest in hockey analytics. In that discussion Corey Pronman wrote the following tweet: @ThomasDrance @adater point is Corsi explains 35% of wins. Luck explains about 40%. If something’s better than Corsi, not much room left. — Corey Pronman (@coreypronman) September 24, 2014   I have seen the above logic from time to time. I think it dates back to…

September 24, 2014