Jun 152009
 

If you haven’t heard yet, Judge Redfield T. Baum has ruled against the Balsillie bid to purchase the Phoenix Coyotes and move them to Hamilton. This means that the Coyotes will remain in Phoenix for at least one more season.

In the 21-page document he said the court didn’t believe there was enough time to resolve all the various issues before the sale of the insolvent team to Balsillie for US$212.5 million that was due to close June 29.

I haven’t yet read the document but when I do I’ll have further comment but I think it would be premature to just assume that Balsillie’s bid to move the Coyotes to Hamilton is now dead in the water. From what I have read the judge has just ruled that Balsillie hasn’t proven his case that the NHL has violated anti-trust laws so he wasn’t going to order the relocation of the team and that the other issues related to the sale of the team cannot be resolved in the time frame required (by the June 29th deadline in the Balsillie bid). The largest outstanding issue was the relocation fee which the Balsillie bid did not address.

The judge did rule that that the NHL will have to address Balsillie’s bid to relocate the team to Hamilton which was submitted to the league a couple weeks ago. Presumable the NHL will reject that bid but the NHL may have to be careful in how that bid is rejected to not clearly violate anti-trust laws. Also, the situation surrounding the Coyotes is still not anywhere close to being finalized. Presumably the next step will be according to the NHLs proposed schedule which will be to hold an auction to sell the team in September with bids only from prospective owners intent on keeping the team in Phoenix. If there are no bids at that time then there will be a second auction where prospective owners looking to relocate the team will bid on the team. At this point Balsillie could once again put in a bid on the team.

We now await comment from the Balsillie camp as to what their plan is from here on. Will they pull their application to the NHL for relocation? Will they stick with it and see what the NHL decides? Will he wait it out and hope to put in a bid when it goes up for auction? Will he attempt to purchase another team that might be for sale?

Update: After reading the full decision this is certainly not a clear win for the NHL or a clear loss for Jim Balsillie. In fact it may be more of a win for Balsillie than the NHL. If I understand the decision correctly (and feel free to correct me if I am wrong) on the issue of relocation, the Judge decided that he was not in position to impose relocation on the league because he could not determine that there was a real dispute in that matter. The judge ruled that the NHL does have the right to approve or deny relocation and does have a right to charge a relocation fee but since the NHL has yet to respond to Balsillie’s request to relocate the Phoenix Coyotes nor have they set a relocation fee to move the team to Hamilton, Balsillie is not in position to claim anti-trust violation or any other reason for dispute and thus the Judge was in no position to rule on the dispute.

The judge also ruled that since this is a busy time of the year, with the NHL Stanley Cup playoffs just ending, the NHL did not have time to act on Balsillie’s request to transfer the Coyotes to Phoenix and ruled that the NHL would not have the time to do so before the June 29th deadline. Although the judge did order the NHL to address the Balsillie request to relocation the Coyotes he did not set a time frame to do so. That said, if the NHL does not act on the request in a timely fashion (i.e. deliberately delaying the issue) or if they unfairly dismiss or vote against the Balsillie transfer request or set an unfairly high transfer fee then Balsillie could go back to the court with a valid dispute and the judge would be forced to make a ruling.

Although Bill Walker, spokesman for Jim Balsillie said there is still time to resolve the issue and have the Coyotes begin next season in Hamilton, that seems unlikely at this point. That is unlikely to end the Balsillie bid but how it affects his offer is unknown. He previously has volunteered to keep the team in Phoenix for another season if the NHL picked up the losses but that is a non-starter for the NHL and may give the NHL a valid reason to reject the Balsillie bid which is a risk I would not want to take if I were Balsillie. Would Balsillie be willing to absorb the losses of another year in Phoenix? That is not yet known, but he may need to if he wants the team because time is not on his side.

Jun 102009
 

Ever since Jerry Moyes decided to take the Phoenix Coyotes to bankruptcy the NHL has chosen to take a hard line against the Moyes-Balsillie scheme but when it comes to the court proceedings their hard line stance has been softened by the judge.

Initially the NHL claimed vehemently that Jerry Moyes did not have the authority to take the team to bankruptcy because the league was in control of the team and had been in control of the team since last November. Moyes argued that he had given up some control of the team, but had not given up the right to file for bankruptcy. The NHL requested a hearing on the issue and essentially Judge Redfield T. Baum to toss out the bankruptcy filing. The judge chose not to make a ruling and instead decided to order the two sides to mediation which essentially didn’t resolve anything and left things pretty much status quo. That being that the team would remain in bankruptcy and court will proceed with the next issue.

The next issue was whether the team was relocatable. Publicly, and in court filings, the NHL insisted that the NHL and only the NHL could decide that matter and that so long as there was a possibility to sell the team to someone interested in keeping the team in Phoenix they had no interest in considering to move the team anywhere. To some extent this was still their stance in court yesterday but the judge has seemed to effectively shift the debate not to whether the team can be moved to Hamiltion, but what relocation fees the NHL would be entitled to if they did move. Although the judge has yet to issue a ruling, it appears that he will either ask the NHL to come up with a suitable relocation fee (with a rationale for that fee) or possibly mandate the two sides into mediation to negotiate an acceptable relocation fee. Depending on your perspective, this can be viewed as either a win for the leaugue or a win for Balsillie. It’s a win for the league because the judge said that the league owns the Hamilton location and has the right to collect a reasonable fee for use of the Hamilton location. From my perspective it is a loss for the league because once again the court is siding against the league in the argument that the league, and only the league, has complete control of relocation. We don’t know for sure but the judge has hinted he would side against the league so long as there aren’t any firm offers on the table that keeps the team in Phoenix and pays off all the creditors. For Balsillie it is a win because the debate has to some extent shifted from can the team be relocated to Hamilton to what will the price of relocation be and that can only be viewed as a positive.

For much of yesterday the judge seemed to go with the idea of ‘we have one, and only one, offer here for $212.5 million, let’s make it work’ and really didn’t give the NHL any leeway because of expressions of interest from other potential buyers. The judge’s mandate is to the pay off the creditors and as of right now he only sees one way to do that and that is with Balsillie’s offer to purchase the team, but this is where things are going to get real interesting. If the NHL’s ultimate goal is to keep a team out of Hamilton they are going to have to argue that Hamilton is such a prime location for hockey that it deserves a high relocation fee which is just strange because if it is such a good market, why would the NHL be so reluctant to have a team there. Second, they will hope that whatever Balsillie’s final offer is less the relocation fee will not be enough to pay off the creditors in full. So, if there was a $100 million relocation fee and Balsillie was willing to pay $250 million, which would only leave $150 million to pay the creditors. This is interesting because according to Moyes, creditors are owed more than that but the league has argued that the creditors are owed less than that because the loans Moyes made to the team are really not loans but capital infusions. They made those arguments in the context that in reality a bid to keep the franchise in Phoenix only needs to be $120 million in order to pay off all the creditors but those arguments may very well come back to haunt them in the future.

The only other caveat in the Balsillie bid is what the judge will decide the City of Glendale is owed for breaking its lease agreement should the team be relocated. The city has argued that that number is over $500 million but that judge countered with ‘he city feels they have a legal right to have team there until 2035. What about in November if league says ‘we’re done. We’re not paying anymore.’ By that he meant you may not be owed anything because there are no assurances that in the future you will get anything because at some point the NHL could just pull the plug on the team. What the judge determines the city is owed for breaking the contract will go a long way to determine whether a Balsillie bid is able to pay off all the creditors in full but even if he can’t pay off the creditors in full he may still win because as of yet there are no offers to pay off any of the creditors anything let alone in full.
Continue reading »

Or maybe we won't…

 NHL  Comments Off
May 122009
 

Yesterday the court, upon request by Jerry Moyes’s legal team, requested that the NHL present to the court all the information it has on the discussions the NHL has had with Jerry Reinsdorf and his interest in purchasing the Phoenix Coyotes. Instead of doing so, this morning the NHL formally objected to that request stating that Jerry Moyes is not in control of the franchise and this is in no position to request that information and the divulging of that information could jeopardize value for the league.

“There is no justification for the efforts of … Moyes to harass the league with such discovery that may prove wholly unnecessary,” said the NHL’s motion. “Premature disclosure of confidential discussions will jeapordize value for the league and all of its member teams, including the Phoenix Coyotes.”

It is an interesting, but I guess not surprising (delay tactics likely), stance to take because supposedly the NHL was en route to discuss with Moyes exactly what the court requested.

May 112009
 

According to CBC, and other sources, the bankruptcy court has, upon request from Jerry Moyes, ordered the NHL to turn over documents related to Reinsdorf’s interest in buying the Phoenix Coyotes. The NHL has claimed that Reinsdorf had shown interest in purchasing the Coyotes but as of yet we really don’t know how serious that interest was. There was talk that Bettman was on his way to meet with Moyes about Reinsdorf’s intent to purchase the franchise while others say that Reinsdorf may have only agreed to look into the idea of purchasing the team when requested by Gary Bettman.

I’ll definitely be interested to know how serious Reinsdorf really is because it could provide some insight as to whether there may at some point be another legitimate offer on the table to keep the team in Phoenix for the bankruptcy judge to consider. I’ll also be interested to know how truthful Bill Daly and others have been because publicly they have stated that the negotiations are very far along. But remember, these two for months also insisted there was never a problem with the Coyotes and that they had not taken over control of the team. Of course, we now know that they are insisting that they took over control of the team in December. The best thing about these court proceedings is that we learn the truth.

May 102009
 

So I sit down for dinner at around 6:30 last night and decide that it is a little quiet so I turn on the TV and watch CBC’s Hockey Night in Canada pre-game show. During the show they had a 15 minute interview with Jim Balsillie (click the link and then click on Inside Hockey: Jim Balsillie). Ron starts off asking the intro question asking Balsillie to tell everyone about what he is doing in putting in an offer for the Coyotes. What came next almost made my jaw drop. Ron MacLean then went on to quote from my article that I wrote a couple days ago. Very cool.

In the comments thread of the previous story I was asked what I thought was the likely outcome of this bankruptcy proceeding will be. The short answer is that I am not a lawyer and thus probably don’t have a clue. But that is dull so let me take a stab at outlining some of the issues that may arise.
I came across a copy of the actual bankruptcy filing which may give us some clues as to where this may lead. What we learn from the bankruptcy filing is that they have valued the teams assets as between $50 and $100 million with liabilities being between $100 million and $500 million. The filing goes on to list the top 40 creditors with secured loans/liabilities (they did not list unsecured loans) of which Jerry Moyes himself is at the top of the list with over $103.8 million being owed to him. The rest of the list doesn’t even total $5 million so by far, Jerry Moyes is the largest creditor. I can only assume that this is money he lent the organization over the past several years to keep it afloat. Other notable creditors are the City of Glendale being owed about $507K and the National Hockey league being owed $271,474.92.

The first defense the NHL is undertaking is that Jerry Moyes was no longer in control of the franchise and that the NHL had been operating it since November and thus Moyes did not have the authority to file the bankruptcy. It will be interesting to see what the NHL’s defense for this is because publicly they have stated on many occasions that they had not taken over the Coyotes, denying rumours that they had. Having no clue what actually happened behind the scenes it is really difficult to determine what the judge will decide here but this might be the league’s best option at stopping the Balsillie. But assuming the NHL can’t get the case tossed out on the grounds that the Moyes wasn’t in control things will get interesting.

In bankruptcy court, the judge’s mandate is to do what he deems in the best interest of the creditors (secured given priority over unsecured) and he has some authority to override existing contracts in order to do so. Moyes has submitted a plan that presumably will keep all of the creditors ‘whole’ meaning that they won’t have to take any cuts in the money that is owed them (i.e. they will be repaid in full). There is little doubt that this offer will be an enticing one for the judge to accept. The only issue is that the Balsillie offer is conditional on him being able to move the team to Southern Ontario. The NHL is going to argue that the Phoenix Coyotes don’t own the rights to an NHL franchise, but rather only own the rights to an NHL franchise in Phoenix and that it is non transferrable. They may have a case here too but it will all depend on the wording of the franchise agreement and what, if any, clauses are within that agreement. If the franchise agreement is explicit in that the franchise is for Phoenix and Phoenix only then they may have a claim, but as we know franchises have been sold and moved (the Coyotes were originally the Winnipeg Jets) so it will be a tough sell on the part of the NHL that the Phoenix Coyotes cannot be moved under any condition.

That might leave the NHL left in a position where the only option to stave off the Balsillie bid is to find another potential owner willing to buy the franchise for enough money to pay off the creditors and be willing to keep the franchise in Phoenix. If this happened then maybe the judge will deem this a better option, even if the offer was lower than Balsillie’s, because he would not have to break any contracts or agreements. But as we know, there is over $108 million in secured debt and who knows how much unsecured debt there is. On top of that Moyes has stated he has lost $73 million over the past three years. It is going to be a real tough task on the part of Bettman and the NHL to find such an owner because that person or entity might have to be willing to pay upwards of $150 million for a franchise that is likely to lose $50-75 million over the next few years. That won’t be an easy sell and presumably Jerry Moyes and the NHL has been looking for such a buyer for the past several months, if not longer, and has come up empty.

That makes the Coyote’s future in Phoenix unlikely at best if the NHL fails in getting the case tossed out of court on the grounds that Moyes was not in control of the franchise and not in authority to file bankruptcy. The only other possible outcome is someone outbids Balsillie be that another owner looking to move the team to Southern Ontario, or someone interested in moving them elsewhere, such as Kansas City. But is there anyone out there willing to pony up $215+ million dollars for a franchise to relocate them anywhere but southern Ontario? I am not sure. For that amount of money the most likely bidders are people looking to move the team to a proven hockey market like Southern Ontario. But you never know. I’ll certainly be interested in how all of this unfolds.

(if there are any lawyers or people knowledgeable on bankruptcy laws out there that have more insight into what may or may not happen I’d definitely be interested in hearing your thoughts)

May 062009
 

What happened to the Phoenix Coyote’s yesterday is what many people suspected may happen to them for a while. They went bankrupt. They went bankrupt despite the fact that over the past year Gary Bettman has continued to tell anyone who would listen that the NHL as a whole and its member teams are generally doing just fine, despite the economic down turn. Most people were smart enough to not listen to Gary Bettman.

What is interesting this time is that Jim Balsillie sat on the sidelines waiting for the moment for the Phoenix Coyote’s to declare bankruptcy. He has learned from past mistakes when he tried to purchase the Penguins and the Predators only to be foiled by Gary Bettman insisting that he cannot move those franchises. With the Coyote’s in bankruptcy court, the decision may not be completely in the NHL’s hands anymore as a judge will pretty much decide what happens to the Coyote’s and if the judge decides that the best way for the Coyote’s to repay its creditors is to sell the team to Balsillie and move it to Southern Ontario, the NHL may not have much say in the matter.
It should also be noted that the Coyote’s apparently filed for bankruptcy without notifying the league as noted in a statement released from the City of Glendale.

“The decision by the ownership of the Phoenix Coyotes to initiate bankruptcy proceedings without consultation or approval of the National Hockey League is an unfortunate turn of events for the NHL, the State of Arizona and the Coyotes’ loyal fans. Even as the propriety of this unprecedented action is being thoroughly investigated by the NHL, city officials are working diligently to ensure that the public’s interest is fully protected throughout this process.

Upon hearing of the news, the NHL immediately stepped in and took over control of the Coyotes removing owner Jerry Moyes ability to operate the club. The NHL is now operating the Phoenix Coyotes and the NHL’s Bill Daly issued a statement of on behalf of the NHL:

“We have just become aware of today’s Bankruptcy Court filing purportedly made on behalf of the Phoenix Coyotes. We are investigating the circumstances surrounding the petition, including the propriety of its filing. We have removed Jerry Moyes from all positions of authority to act for or on behalf of the Club. The League will appear and proceed before the Bankruptcy Court in the best interests of all of the Club’s constituencies, including its fans in Arizona and the League’s 29 other Member Clubs.”

It’ll be interesting to watch the league make its arguments in bankruptcy court because in theory bankruptcy court is about getting the best deal for the creditors of the Phoenix Coyotes, and not what is in the best interest of the club, the fans, or the leagues 29 other member clubs. The bankruptcy court judge is unlikely to listen to any arguments related to the best interest of the 29 other teams (other than in reference to any money the Coyotes may owe the league from money they were advanced) and certainly not in respect to the fans, except in consideration to any money they may have put down for 20010-11 season tickets (all dozen of them?).

This really was a devious plan that Balsillie and Moyes worked up. Moyes, unable to find anyone to pony up money to take the Coyotes off his hands and keep the Coyotes in Phoenix, knew that the best and easiest chance to sell the team for maximum return was to sell the team to Jim Balsillie. But Balsillie also knew from his Penguin and Predators experience that Bettman could force the sale of the team to another entity, even if the sale price was lower, as he did with both the Penguins and Predators. By taking the league to bankruptcy and then having Balsillie put in the offer they really are taking Gary Bettman out of the equation. I just can’t imagine the angst and anger that Bettman, Daly and the rest of the crew at NHL headquarters is feeling right now. The fate of the Phoenix Coyotes is no longer in the hands of Betman et al but rather in the hands of a bankruptcy court judge. It is quite likely that the only way they can block the sale of the team to Balsillie and have it moved to Southern Ontario is to find a better offer but one has to wonder how likely that is. Plus we know that the NHL Players Association is all for another team in Southern Ontario so they will likely side on behalf of Balsillie as well as might some of the richer clubs that have to pay into revenue sharing. This might be the first stage of Bettman losing complete control over the league.

If I were Bettman I would really do my hardest to embrace Balsillie because he isn’t going away. If somehow Bettman can resolve this Coyote situation, possibly with an owner interested in moving the team to Kansas City or Las Vegas or somewhere else, there are a number of other teams that Balsillie will target. The Florida Panthers, Tampa Bay Lightning, and Atlanta Thrashers are anything but strong organizations and the Nashville Predators have still not proven to be financially stable over the long haul.

Jan 222009
 

Over the past several weeks we have had several tidbits of information come out giving indication to the general state of the NHL economy.

Dec. 22: NHL defies economy, projects rise in revenue

The NHL projects a 2 percent increase in league revenue for the 2008-09 season despite facing one of the worst economic crises to hit North America since the league contracted from 10 to six franchises around the time of the Great Depression

Dec. 24: Report: Coyotes receiving financial assistance from NHL

According to The Globe and Mail, the Coyotes are receiving financial assistance from the National Hockey League to keep the team afloat. The report indicates the team is receiving advances on their share of league revenue.

Jan 18: Paul Kelly Admits Escrow Payments to Rise”

Last night between games on HNIC, NHLPA executive director Paul Kelly was interviewed by Ron MacLean (link to HD video of the entire interview). The first thing they discussed was the rumor that escrow payments made by the players would be rising from 13% of their pay to 17-20%. Kelly wouldn’t say exactly how much the payment would rise, but he did answer in the affirmative that the 17-20% range was accurate.

Jan. 22: Report: Predators may buy own tickets to ensure NHL funds

According to the Tennessean, Predators officials have discussed the option of buying up unsold tickets to ensure they collect the maximum revenue-sharing from the league. Earlier this month, an ESPN.com report indicated the Coyotes forfeited 25% of their full share for failing to meet specific targets.

So, what can we conclude from all of this. First off, not everything is all rosey in all NHL locations despite what Gary Bettman would want you to believe. Clearly the Coyotes and Predators continue to struggle financially and I am sure Tampa, Florida, Atlanta, the Islanders and a few others are not that much better off.

Second, the players are going to have to give back a huge chunk of money because their salaries will far exceed the percentage of revenue they are allotted. This, I believe, will be a first for the players under the new CBA and it will be interesting to see how the players react to not getting as much money as they contracts stipulate. We can be pretty certain that the players will decide not to opt out of the current CBA (a smart thing to do in tough economic times) but when it expires for real in a couple of years when hopefully the economy has turned around and they might be in a better bargaining position, lets see how much of an issue this becomes.

Finally, the 2% revenue increase should give us some insight into what next years salary cap could be. When the salary cap gets set it is based on the previous years revenue and then the players can opt to boost it by up to 5% pending revenue growth projections. The players have always opted to do this including for this season. But, revenue growth has not grown by 5% and thus the cap is essentially higher, by about 3%, that it should be based on this years revenues and this will be reflected in next years salary cap numbers.

A few months ago <a href=”http://www.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=804″I discussed a variety of scenarios of revenue growth and the falling Canadian dollar and the impact they will have on the salary cap next season. I can now refine that projection using the 2% revenue growth number.

2007-08 Revenue: $2.62 billion
2008-09 Revenue: $2.67 billion (estimated based on 2% growth)

With revenue of $2.67 billion next years salary cap will be approximately $55.8 million with the players having the option to increase it to $58.2 million. So far the players have always opted to increase the salary cap the maximum amount they are allowed to but with projections being next years revenue will drop, not increase, it is quite likely they will not opt to implement the salary cap increase.

The NHL probably has fairly good projections for the remainder of this years regular season as many teams have sold a significant portion of their tickets and advertising revenues are all pretty much booked and accounted for. Playoff revenue is a different story as not a single playoff ticket has been sold yet and if the economy is still in the dumpers as many people expect, will NHL teams be able to jack up playoff ticket prices as much this year as they have in the past? If they can’t, that 2% revenue growth could be an optimistic number. Only time will tell but everything seems to be pointing to a drop in the salary cap of $1-2 million next season and quite possibly stagnant or dropping further the following season.

Oct 172008
 

Bruce Garrioch, Tim Baines, Don Brennan and Chris Stevenson of the Ottawa Sun wrote a ‘discussion style’ article today that brings up an interesting point about the importance of offense from the defensemen.

Don Brennan: Waiting for you guys to say something smart is like waiting for snow to melt … The Senators’ defence last season was a collection of Orrs, Harveys and Coffeys compared to this group. Each year, the Stanley Cup champions get 200-plus points from their blueline. The Senators will be lucky to get 130 from theirs this season. Case closed.

I decided to look into this a little more. Last years Stanley Cup winner, the Detroit Red Wings, had 204 points from their defensemen in the regular season. That was good for best in the NHL. Here are how the rest of the teams defenses stacked up last year including whether they made the playoffs or not.

Eastern Conference

Rank Team DefPts Playoffs
1 Montreal 198 Y
2 Pittsburgh 160 Y
3 Toronto 160 N
4 Buffalo 154 N
5 Washington 148 Y
6 Florida 146 N
7 Ottawa 146 Y
8 Philadelphia 143 Y
9 Boston 136 Y
10 NY Rangers 134 Y
11 Tampa 131 N
12 Carolina 128 N
13 New Jersey 123 Y
14 NY Islanders 120 N
15 Atlanta 91 N

Western Conference

Rank Team DefPts Playoffs
1 Detroit 204 Y
2 Anaheim 165 Y
3 Nashville 160 Y
4 Chicago 151 N
5 Dallas 150 Y
6 Calgary 148 Y
7 Los Angeles 146 N
8 San Jose 146 Y
9 Minnesota 144 Y
10 Phoenix 140 N
11 Colorado 129 Y
12 St. Louis 120 N
13 Vancouver 116 N
14 Edmonton 114 N
15 Columbus 109 N

In the eastern conference, if offense from the defense was the sole factor in making the playoffs Toronto, Buffalo and Florida would have made it and in the west Chicago and Los Angeles would have. But clearly there is some kind of correlation (direct or indirect) between offense from the defense and a teams success. The bottom four teams in the west and four of the bottom 5 in the east missed the playoffs. Simply put, if your defense aren’t producing much offense you will struggle to make the playoffs.

Going a step further, if we look at each playoff matchup we will find the majority of the matchups had the team with the most regular season points from defensemen winning the playoff series. The only exceptions to this are Dallas (150 points) defeating Anaheim (165 points), Colorado (129) defeating Minnesota (144), San Jose (146) defeating Calgary (148) and Philadelphia (143) defeating Washington (148) in the first round and Philadelphia (143) defeating Montreal (198) in the second round.

Of those 5 exceptions, the San Jose-Calgary and Philadelphia-Washington series very similar point production from their defense (within 5 points of each other) so really they aren’t exceptions. They were also both 7 game series so the closeness of the series matched the closeness of their offense from defensemen totals. Plus San Jose added Brian Campbell to their defense which probably gave them the edge over Calgary in regards to offense from their defense.

That really just leaved three series where the team with the lower scoring defensemen defeated teams with higher scoring defensemen and in the case of Dallas, it isn’t like that are lacking in the offense from defense department anyway. Going back one season we saw two teams with high scoring defenses play in the Stanley Cup finals as the Anaheim Ducks (209) defeat the Ottawa Senators (191).

There are certainly a lot of other factors that go into what makes a successful team but based on the past couple seasons, being able to produce offense from your defense seems to be a fairly important factor. Some highly offensive defensemen switched teams this past summer (Boyle to San Jose, Campbell to Chicago, Visnovsky to Edmonton, Redden to NY Rangers, Streit to NY Islanders, McCabe to Florida, etc) so lets see if this really makes an impact on the success of those teams. So far it is a mixed bag with San Jose (4-0-0), the Rangers (5-1-0) and Edmonton (2-0-0) looking like winners while Chicago (1-2-1) and the Islanders (2-2-0) having mixed results.

As for the Senators, they sit at 1-1-1 with 6 points (on 8 goals) from defensemen with newcomer Filip Kuba leading the team with 4 assists.